The Equal Opportunity Act 2010 sets out that make discrimination in employment
against the law. Federal anti-discrimination laws also apply to whole
employers.
These directives, and others, have as their purpose the outlawing of
discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief, age, disability, sexual
orientation, race and also cover harassment in the workplace, victimisation,
equal pay for men and women, access to the workplace for persons with a
disability, measure to be taken to accommodate disability, and so on.
(a)
Indirect discrimination
occurs where an apparently neutral provision puts persons of a particular
gender (being As or Bs) at a particular disadvantage in respect of any matter
other than remuneration compared with other employees of their employer.
( why male is being paid
higher remuneration as compared to female ?)
(b)
Where paragraph (a) applies, the employer shall be treated for the purposes of
this Act as discriminating against each of the persons referred to (including A
or B), unless the provision is objectively justified by a legitimate aim and
the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary.
In
2010 middle of December, JTA, Mr. J Is playing upward social comparison through indirect discrimination
by playing office politic
by fencing Ms. X and promote her with the title of international intellectual
property, but at the same time, Mr. J playing downward social comparison against Ms. LY just
because she is being manipulated
and broken her career lines.
It
just because Lai Yen resigned and calling back to JTA to disturb the new staffs
by complaint Jason is what kind of dirty method that he played office politics
by giving bad referee to Great Eastern Life. J scolded LY too excessively and
make her crops being completely destroyed and broken her career lines.
Job
31:8-20
Then
let my crops be destroyed, or let others eat the food I grow. If I have been attracted to my neighbor's
wife, and waited, hidden, outside her door, then let my wife cook another man's
food and sleep in another man's bed.
Jude
1:6
And
the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he
hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the
great day.
Our
plants or seedless is destroyed and let the bees or insects to eat the rotten
foods. We included our neighbourhood decided to engaged self-destruction
together just because of anger, anxiety, anxious attachment and narcissism
personalities to let the all seedless to be dried dead and ruined together with
all the crops that we are planted.
Although
we had being killed the body by the fallen angel, but he could not kill our
soul
The
fallen angels is being punished to leave their first estate and come town to
the earth.
In
either case, God did not let this rebellion stand. He judged and punished these
fallen angels. Specifically, Peter uses the Greek word "Tartarus,"
which was a part of the Greek underworld. This is somewhat different from the
other biblical references to "hell," though it shares a close
relation. Peter says that these angels remain there, being held in chains, or
pits, of darkness until God is ready to fully judge them for their sin.
The
Book of Enoch explains that a group of rebellious angels—referred to above as
the sons of God—"left their first estate" (heaven, or the sky) and
came down (fell) to Earth to marry human women and have children with them.
Jude makes mention of these angels in the New Testament:
2
Peter 2:4
For
if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them to hell, putting
them in chains of darkness to be held for judgment;
Such
wickedness should be punished by death.
It
would be like a destructive, hellish fire, consuming everything I have. When any of my servants complained against me,
I would listen and treat them fairly ?
wicked,
who are consigned to aionios fire, the fire burns and completely destroys. But
the eternal aspect of the fire is its everlasting effect,
(1 John 3:4).
Sin
is a violation of the law of God . If there were no punishment for sin, then
there could be no law for law without penalty is null and void. If there is no
law, there would be no sin. That would make the death of Jesus useless because
if there is no sin there is no responsibility to save anyone from it.
If I
did not, how could I then face God? What could I say when God came to judge me?
15 The same God who created me created my servants also. 16 I have never
refused to help the poor; never have I let widows live in despair 17 or let
orphans go hungry while I ate. 18 All my life I have taken care of them. 19
When I found someone in need, too poor to buy clothes, 20 I would give him
clothing made of wool that had come from my own flock of sheep. Then he would
praise me with all his heart.
How
he played office politics ? By just advertised the E&Y Newspapers . The Newspapers
considered as a inciting
weapon to harmed all the specific audience to cause all the victims
Malaysia 911 is going to
murder, suicide, sexual assault as a result that arise vilification through audience
(newspapers)
Inciting
included harming someone else that are being manipulated into a form of
attempted conspiracy incitement which caused the consequences of murder,
suicide, sexual assault and serious vilification through specific audience such
a newspaper website commit.
The criminal liability that arose is resulted someone else suffered
nervous shock, nuisance , post traumatic stress disorder, depression and etc
and resulted all specific audience to homicide due to someone being
communicated through newspaper to do so. As
As a result of his inciting act through
newspapers :
The
consequences of Mr. J foolish and childish acts in exhibited the upward and
downward social comparison which is another mirror reflection likes snow white
1.)
one go to jump and commit
suicide in Singapore
2.)
another is go to admit to Schizoprenia
illness , suffered a lot illness, incurred huge quantum of medical
expenses, side effects, hospitalization entry fees
3.) Nervous
shock
4.) Nuisance
5.) Unemployment
6.) Broken
career line –
keep on doing public disturbance like asking Sonia from
E&Y to disturb my career job such as calling to Micheal Tan & Co
&Tor & Co
7.) Indirect Discrimination - Oppression
Indirect discrimination is often less obvious. Sometimes, a
policy, rule or practice seems fair because it applies to everyone equally, but
a closer look shows that some people are being treated unfairly. This is
because some people or groups of people, are unable or less able to comply with
the rule or are disadvantaged because of it. If this policy or practice is not
reasonable, it may be indirect discrimination.
8.) Victimization
after post employment
9.) Harassment
10) Bullying
11) Riot or violence
12) defamation
13) malicious
14) social injustice
15) Jealousy
16) Humiliating
17) Hatred emotion
18) Insulatation
19) Scartistic
20) PTSD - depresssion
Harassment may include bullying behaviour, and it refers to
bad treatment that is related to a protected characteristic, such as age, sex,
disability, race, gender, religion or sexual orientation.
More specifically, the law defines it as 'unwanted conduct
related to a relevant protected characteristic, which has the purpose or effect
of violating an individual's dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile,
degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for that individual.'
Bullying
Bullying can be
defined as offensive, intimidating, malicious or insulting behaviour, an abuse
of misuse of power that undermines, humiliates, denigrates or injures the
recipient (emotionally or physically) - but it doesn't have a legal definition
in the Equality Act. In fact bullying behaviour is very similar to harassment,
but it is not related to a protected characteristic.
That said, the absence
of bullying from the statute books doesn't mean that people who are being
bullied - rather than harassed - have no protections. Neither does it mean that
bullies can get away with doing whatever they like as long as their behaviour
is not concerning a protected characteristic.
Employers have a 'duty
of care' for their employees. No good firm would want its people working in an
intimidating, hostile or offensive environment.
In any case, organisations
that don't act on bullying effectively are likely to see lower levels of
performance, productivity and engagement, as well as increased absence and high
staff turnover - all of which can damage the bottom line.
People who feel they
are being bullied are usually advised to raise a formal grievance if the matter
cannot be resolved informally.
Dealing with
grievances internally can be costly in time and money, and sap morale among
staff. A breakdown in mutual trust and confidence at work because of bullying
could leave employers open to claims of constructive dismissal at an employment
tribunal.
So it's in every
employer's interests to promote a safe, healthy and fair environment in which
people can work without fear of being bullied, harassed or victimised.
Equally it's also in
an employer's interests to try and nip unwanted behaviour in the bud by dealing
with matters quickly and informally, where they can, thereby protecting the
working relationship.
You
are worth more than many sparrow !
It
started that begin with constant humiliation, tortue, ill treatment that
undergo insidious messages.
The
conversation that beginned with “ you are worthless, you are no value, you are
useless” !
-
These would subvert healthy self esteem, self destructive
behavior and suicide factor.
Even
you are being victimization by unfair treatment due to social categorization as
a result of unfair treatments or position due to certain gang stalking. Yet, it
was a direct weapon tortue is to attack and destroy self-worth targeted
individualLike demon mobbing, a large group of gang-stalkers participated in a
collective attack on one person. The continuous barrage of psychological abuses
is designed to isolate and destabilize the victim.
“<Under demon influence, the
man named Legion walked about naked, and day and night he cried aloud and
slashed himself with stones. All efforts to bind him, even with fetters and
chains, were unsuccessful>.
<Christ
Jesus, however, freed this man and his companion from the power of the demons.
Thereafter the expelled demons took possession of a herd of swine and caused
these to rush over a precipice to their death in the Sea of Galilee. The freed
man, in gratitude and faith, became a follower of Jesus Christ.>”
Even
you are in the state of self-transcendence, Reed theorized “that people facing
life-threatening experiences may acquire this expanded awareness of self and
environment and that self-transcendence is expressed through various behaviors
and perspectives such as sharing wisdom with others, integrating the physical
changes of aging, accepting death as part of life, having an interest in
helping others and learning about the world, letting go of losses, and finding
spiritual meaning in life.”
Gang-stalking
is a common perversion among demons according to the scriptures (Matt.
12:43-45).
At
this state, it enable them to reap unnatural satisfaction and gratification due
to they are able to abuse, bully, violence, humiliating, assault, tortue ,
acquire sadistic desires and destabilize victim of victimization due to
indirect discrimination and ingestion.
Just
what gratification this gave the demons is unknown, but there must have been
something about it that enabled them to reap an unnatural satisfaction. It
certainly gave them opportunity to torture, vent sadistic desires, and also to
partake of the cowardly mob spirit by ganging up on men.
So,
who would you say are the original gang-stalkers? Who invented this evil?
Clearly, the demons. It satisfies the selfish motives of the group practicing
it. It is not a tool of justice. It is rather a gross violation of basic human
rights. It ignores universally honored principles of justice. It is designed to
torment, harass, and victimize the powerless. And, it is cowardly, an
expression of mob violence, as the demons demonstrated.
No comments:
Post a Comment